The Resilience of Computationalism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Computationalism—the view that cognition is computation—has always been controversial. It faces two types of objection. According to insufficiency objections, computation is insufficient for some cognitive phenomenon X. According to objections from neural realization, cognitive processes are realized by neural processes, but neural processes have feature Y, and having Y is incompatible with being (or realizing) computations. In this article, I explain why computationalism has survived these objections. To adjudicate the dispute between computationalism and its foes, I will conclude that we need a better account of computation.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalPhilosophy of Science
Volume77
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Keywords

  • Gualtiero Piccinini
  • Journal Article
  • Philosophy

Disciplines

  • Philosophy

Cite this