Self-Control, Social Bonds, and Desistance: A Test of Life-Course Interdependence

Elaine Eggleston Doherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

<div class="line" id="line-23"> Theoretical debates and empirical tests on the explanation of stability and change in offending over time have been ongoing for over a decade pitting Gottfredson and Hirschi's (1990) criminal propensity model against Sampson and Laub's (1993) life&hyphen;course model of informal social control. In 2001, Wright and his colleagues found evidence of a moderating relationship between criminal propensity, operationalized as self&hyphen;control, and prosocial ties on crime, a relationship they term life&hyphen;course interdependence. The current study extends their research by focusing on this moderating relationship and the developmental process of desistance from crime among serious juvenile delinquents. Contrary to the life&hyphen;course interdependence hypothesis, the results indicate that whereas self&hyphen;control and social bonds are strongly related to desistance from crime, there is no evidence of a moderating relationship between these two factors on desistance among this sample. The implications of this research for life&hyphen;course theories of crime, future research, and policies regarding desistance are discussed.</div>
Original languageAmerican English
JournalCriminology
Volume44
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 11 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • criminal propensity
  • desistance
  • life course
  • social integration

Disciplines

  • Psychology
  • Criminology

Cite this