Rejoinder to Critics of Place Matters

Todd Swanstrom

doi:10.1177/1078087416628687

Rejoinder to Critics of Place Matters

Todd Swanstrom

University of Missouri-St. Louis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This rejoinder to the previous three critiques acknowledges the gaps and omissions in Place Matters but defends its central argument about the need for a political coalition to push for more regional approaches to spatial inequalities supported by more progressive state and national policies.

Original language	American English
Journal	Urban Affairs Review
Volume	53
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416628687
State	Published - Jan 1 2017

Disciplines

Economics
Growth and Development

Access to Document

10.1177/1078087416628687License: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{cc8cd25bdd4342a288326f6a1bdcea76,

title = "Rejoinder to Critics of Place Matters",

abstract = " This rejoinder to the previous three critiques acknowledges the gaps and omissions in Place Matters but defends its central argument about the need for a political coalition to push for more regional approaches to spatial inequalities supported by more progressive state and national policies.",

author = "Todd Swanstrom",

note = "This rejoinder to the previous three critiques acknowledges the gaps and omissions in Place Matters but defends its central argument about the need for a politi...",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1078087416628687",

language = "American English",

volume = "53",

journal = "Urban Affairs Review",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rejoinder to Critics of Place Matters

AU - Swanstrom, Todd

N1 - This rejoinder to the previous three critiques acknowledges the gaps and omissions in Place Matters but defends its central argument about the need for a politi...

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This rejoinder to the previous three critiques acknowledges the gaps and omissions in Place Matters but defends its central argument about the need for a political coalition to push for more regional approaches to spatial inequalities supported by more progressive state and national policies.

AB - This rejoinder to the previous three critiques acknowledges the gaps and omissions in Place Matters but defends its central argument about the need for a political coalition to push for more regional approaches to spatial inequalities supported by more progressive state and national policies.

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1078087416628687

U2 - 10.1177/1078087416628687

DO - 10.1177/1078087416628687

M3 - Article

VL - 53

JO - Urban Affairs Review

JF - Urban Affairs Review

ER -

Rejoinder to Critics of Place Matters

Abstract

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this