Physical Functioning, Mental Health, and Quality of Life in Different Congenital Heart Defects: Comparative Analysis in 3538 Patients From 15 Countries

Philip Moons, Koen Luyckx, Corina Thomet, Werner Budts, Junko Enomoto, Maayke A. Sluman, Chun-Wei Lu, Jamie L. Jackson, Paul Khairy, Stephen. C. Cook, Shanthi Chidambarathanu, Luis Alday, Katrine Eriksen, Mikael Dellborg, Malin Berghammer, Bengt Johansson, Andrew S. Mackie, Samuel A. Menahem, Maryanne Caruana, Gruschen VeldtmanAlexandra Soufi, Susan M. Fernandes, Kamila S. White, Edward Callus, Shelby Kutty, Fouke Ombelet, Silke Apers, Adrienne H. Kovacs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background
We compared physical functioning, mental health, and quality of life (QoL) of patients with different subtypes of  congenital heart disease  (CHD) in a large international sample and investigated the role of functional class in explaining the variance in outcomes across heart defects.
Methods
In the cross-sectional Assessment of Patterns of Patient-Reported Outcome in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease-International Study (APPROACH-IS), we enrolled 4028 adult patients with CHD from 15 countries. Diagnostic groups with at least 50 patients were included in these analyses, yielding a sample of 3538 patients (median age: 32 years; 52% women). Physical functioning, mental health, and QoL were measured with the SF-12 health status survey,  Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale  (HADS), linear analog scale (LAS) and  Satisfaction with Life Scale , respectively. Functional class was assessed using the patient-reported New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. Multivariable general linear mixed models were applied to assess the relationship between the type of CHD and patient-reported outcomes, adjusted for patient characteristics, and with country as random effect.
Results
Patients with  coarctation of the aorta  and those with isolated  aortic valve disease  reported the best physical functioning, mental health, and QoL. Patients with  cyanotic heart disease  or  Eisenmenger syndrome  had worst outcomes. The differences were statistically significant, above and beyond other patient characteristics. However, the explained variances were small (0.6% to 4.1%) and decreased further when functional status was added to the models (0.4% to 0.9%).
Conclusions
Some types of CHD predict worse patient-reported outcomes. However, it appears that it is the functional status associated with the heart defect rather than the heart defect itself that shapes the outcomes.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalCanadian Journal of Cardiology
Volume37
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2021

Disciplines

  • Psychology

Cite this