In Defense of Radical Social Constructivism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article is a response to Alex North's critique of radical social constructivism (RSC). North claimed that RSC was a movement in counseling that would be monumentally problematic in its future application to counseling theory. In this article, the author defends RSC and posits that RSC is closely aligned with the values of counseling. RSC encourages counselors to look at the social understanding of clients' experiences as paramount to the behaviors they exhibit.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of Counseling and Development
Volume95
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Disciplines

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Psychology
  • Psychology

Cite this