How Indirect Can Indirect Utilitarianism Be

Eric Wiland

doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00018.x

How Indirect Can Indirect Utilitarianism Be

University of Missouri-St. Louis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Volume	74
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00018.x
State	Published - Jan 3 2007

Disciplines

Philosophy
Epistemology

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00018.xLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{3ce99ab2a01448f5aa8ac19efba21e70,

title = "How Indirect Can Indirect Utilitarianism Be",

author = "Eric Wiland",

note = "Most act-utilitarians now reject the direct utilitarianism of Bentham. They do so because they are convinced of what I call the paradox of utilitarianism--the t...",

year = "2007",

month = jan,

day = "3",

doi = "10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00018.x",

language = "American English",

volume = "74",

journal = "Philosophy and Phenomenological Research",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Indirect Can Indirect Utilitarianism Be

AU - Wiland, Eric

N1 - Most act-utilitarians now reject the direct utilitarianism of Bentham. They do so because they are convinced of what I call the paradox of utilitarianism--the t...

PY - 2007/1/3

Y1 - 2007/1/3

UR - http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/40041044

U2 - 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00018.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00018.x

M3 - Article

VL - 74

JO - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

JF - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

ER -

How Indirect Can Indirect Utilitarianism Be

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this