Disagreement in Assessing Neighboring and Collective Efficacy: The Role of Social Distance:

John R. Hipp; Seth A. Williams; Adam Boessen

doi:10.1177/2378023118769536

Disagreement in Assessing Neighboring and Collective Efficacy: The Role of Social Distance:

University of Missouri-St. Louis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Default journal
Volume	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118769536
State	Published - Jan 1 2018

Disciplines

Economics
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Criminology

Access to Document

10.1177/2378023118769536License: Unspecified

Disagreement_in_Assessing_Neighboring_and_Collecti.pdfFinal published version, 302 KBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{8f15df1d7a69429f9802c0d32343bf93,

title = "Disagreement in Assessing Neighboring and Collective Efficacy: The Role of Social Distance:",

author = "Hipp, \{John R.\} and Williams, \{Seth A.\} and Adam Boessen",

note = "Whereas existing research typically treats variability in residents' reports of collective efficacy and neighboring as measurement error, the authors consider s...",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/2378023118769536",

language = "American English",

volume = "4",

journal = "Default journal",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disagreement in Assessing Neighboring and Collective Efficacy: The Role of Social Distance:

AU - Hipp, John R.

AU - Williams, Seth A.

AU - Boessen, Adam

N1 - Whereas existing research typically treats variability in residents' reports of collective efficacy and neighboring as measurement error, the authors consider s...

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2378023118769536

U2 - 10.1177/2378023118769536

DO - 10.1177/2378023118769536

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - Default journal

JF - Default journal

ER -

Disagreement in Assessing Neighboring and Collective Efficacy: The Role of Social Distance:

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this