TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential Item Functioning in Biodata: Opportunity Access as an Explanation of Gender- and Race-Related DIF
AU - Imus, Anna
AU - Schmitt, Neal
AU - Kim, Brian
AU - Oswald, Frederick L.
AU - Merritt, Stephanie
AU - Wrestring, Alyssa Friede
N1 - Investigations of differential item functioning (DIF) have been conducted mostly on ability tests and have found little evidence of easily interpretable differences across various demographic subgroups. In this study, we examined the degree to which DIF in biographical data items referencing academically relevant background, experiences, and interests was related to differences in judgments about access to these experiences by members of different gender and race subgroups.
PY - 2010/12/30
Y1 - 2010/12/30
N2 - Investigations of differential item functioning (DIF) have been conducted mostly on ability tests and have found little evidence of easily interpretable differences across various demographic subgroups. In this study, we examined the degree to which DIF in biographical data items referencing academically relevant background, experiences, and interests was related to differences in judgments about access to these experiences by members of different gender and race subgroups. DIF in the location parameter was significantly related (r = -0.51, p less than 0.01) to gender differences in perceived accessibility to experience. No significant relationships with accessibility were observed for DIF in the slope parameter across gender groups or for the slope and location parameters associated with DIF across Black and White groups. Practical implications for use of biodata and theoretical implications for DIF research are discussed. (Contains 5 tables and 1 figure.)
AB - Investigations of differential item functioning (DIF) have been conducted mostly on ability tests and have found little evidence of easily interpretable differences across various demographic subgroups. In this study, we examined the degree to which DIF in biographical data items referencing academically relevant background, experiences, and interests was related to differences in judgments about access to these experiences by members of different gender and race subgroups. DIF in the location parameter was significantly related (r = -0.51, p less than 0.01) to gender differences in perceived accessibility to experience. No significant relationships with accessibility were observed for DIF in the slope parameter across gender groups or for the slope and location parameters associated with DIF across Black and White groups. Practical implications for use of biodata and theoretical implications for DIF research are discussed. (Contains 5 tables and 1 figure.)
UR - https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ910735
U2 - 10.1080/08957347.2011.532412
DO - 10.1080/08957347.2011.532412
M3 - Article
VL - 24
JO - Applied Measurement in Education
JF - Applied Measurement in Education
ER -