Abstract
Assigning a grade to students' class contribution may be 1 of the most controversial and difficult challenges that instructors face. The authors examine the perceived fairness of class contribution grading methods from the perspective of the performance appraisal literature. In 2 scenario studies based on actual grading techniques, the authors examined perceptions of fair assessment. Participants were undergraduate students from 2 universities. A theoretical model of procedural justice provided the background. Results indicate that 3 objective aspects of grading--explicitness of grading criteria, frequency of feedback, and proactiveness of instructor techniques--affect perceived fairness. (Contains 2 figures and 4 tables.)
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Journal | The Journal of Education for Business |
Volume | 83 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 1 2008 |
Externally published | Yes |
Disciplines
- Computer Sciences
- Library and Information Science
- Curriculum and Instruction