Aggregate-Level Lead Exposure, Gun Violence, Homicide, and Rape

Brian B. Boutwell, Erik J. Nelson, Zhengmin Qian, Michael G. Vaughn, John P. Wright, John P. Wright, Kevin M. Beaver, Kevin M. Beaver, J. C. Barnes, Melissa Petkovsek, Roger Lewis, Mario Schootman, Richard Rosenfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Context
An increasing body of research has linked the geographic distribution of lead with various indicators of criminal and antisocial behavior.

Objective
The current study, using data from an ongoing project related to lead exposure in St. Louis City, MO, analyzed the association between aggregate blood lead levels and specific indicators violent crime within the city.

Design
Ecological study.

Setting
St. Louis, Missouri.

Exposure measure
Blood lead levels.

Main outcome measure
Official reports of violent crimes were categorized as 1) crimes involving a firearm (yes/no), 2) assault crimes (with or without a firearm), 3) robbery crimes (with or without a firearm), 4) homicides and 5) rape.

Results
With the exception of rape, aggregate blood-lead levels were statistically significant predictors of violent crime at the census tract level. The risk ratios for each of the outcome measures were as follows: firearm crimes 1.03 (1.03–1.04), assault crimes 1.03 (1.02–1.03), robbery crimes 1.03 (1.02–1.04), homicide 1.03 (1.01, 1.04), and rape 1.01 (0.99–1.03).

Conclusions
Extending prior research in St. Louis, results suggest that aggregated lead exposure at the census tract level predicted crime outcomes, even after accounting for important sociological variables. Moving forward, a more developed understanding of aggregate level crime may necessitate a shift toward studying the synergy between sociological and biological risk factors such as lead exposure.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 27 2017

Disciplines

  • Criminology and Criminal Justice
  • Criminology
  • Demography, Population, and Ecology

Cite this